Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NANDKISHORE R AGRAWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The High Court held that the writ petition is allowed and directed the trial court to dispose of the pending criminal case within six months.

Summary

The petitioner, Nandkishore R. Agrawal, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 seeking an order to expedite a criminal trial (C.C. No. 461/PW/2005) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, 65th Court, Andheri, which had been languishing since 2005. He alleged severe health problems, including three heart attacks and a cancer diagnosis, and argued that the inordinate delay violated his right to a speedy trial. The State of Maharashtra opposed the petition, merely requesting that an appropriate order be passed. Justice Shivkumar Dige, after hearing counsel, noted the extraordinary delay of over twenty years and ordered the petition to be allowed. The court directed the trial court to dispose of the case as early as possible, preferably within six months of receipt of the order, and thereafter disposed of the writ petition. The order reflects the court’s supervisory jurisdiction to ensure timely disposal of criminal proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can, under its writ jurisdiction, direct a lower criminal court to expedite a pending trial.
  • Whether the prolonged delay in the criminal case violates the petitioner’s constitutional right to a speedy trial.

Subjects

  • expedite trial
  • right to speedy trial
  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • High Court of Bombay
  • judicial delay

Judgment

                                                                                         61-WP-4000-2026 (CR).doc

                              S.S.Kilaje


                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4000 OF 2026

                                    Nandkishore R Agrawal                                        … Petitioner
                                    VERSUS
SONALI by
           Digitally signed
          SONALI
                                    State Of Maharashtra                                         … Respondent
SATISH Date:
       SATISH KILAJE


KILAJE 2026.08.28
       14:40:49 +0530




                                    _________________________________________________________________

                                    Advocate S.B.Rao, for Petitioner.
                                    Mr. S.S.Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State.
                                    Mr. Dipak Thorat, PSI, Oshiwara Police Station, present.
                                    _________________________________________________________________

                                                                          CORAM      :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                          DATE       :   27th AUGUST, 2026.
                                    P.C. :

                                    1.         By this petition, the petitioner is seeking expedite the trial

                                    pending before the learned J.M.F.C., 65th Court, Andheri, Mumbai, as it is

                                    pending since long time.

                                    2.         It is contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that

                                    petitioner is complainant in the said criminal complaint, he has suffered

                                    three heart attacks and he has diagnosed with cancer, still there is no

                                    progress in the matter though it is pending for more than 20 years and

                                    requested to allow the petition.

                                    3.         Learned APP submits that appropriate order be passed.

                                    4.         I have heard both the learned counsel. It is very surprising that



                                                                       Page 1 of 2
                                                             61-WP-4000-2026 (CR).doc

S.S.Kilaje


      the criminal case is pending since year 2005, yet there is no progress.

      Considering this fact, I pass following order.



                                         ORDER

                     (i)     Writ Petition is allowed.

                     (ii)    The learned J.M.F.C., 65th Court, Andheri, Mumbai,

                             shall expedite      the police case     i.e.   C.C. No.

                             461/PW/2005 and shall dispose of the same as early

                             as possible preferably within six months after receipt

                             of this order.

      5.         Writ Petition is disposed of.



                                                       (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                        Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.