Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DYANESHWAR TUKARAM SAVADHversusMAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION STATE TRANSPORT THROUGH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed.

Summary

The petitioner, Dyaneshwar Tukaram Savadh, filed Writ Petition No. 4055 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, seeking relief against the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and the State Transport through Divisional Controller. The petition was listed before Justice Shailesh P. Brahme. Counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that nothing survived in the petition. The Court held that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of as become infructuous.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                                  904 WP 4055 22.odt

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    904 WRIT PETITION NO. 4055 OF 2022

                       DYANESHWAR TUKARAM SAVADH
                                     VERSUS
      MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION STATE
        TRANSPORT THROUGH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER AND ANR
                                        ...
     Advocate for Petitioner : Adv. Ketaki Sahastrabudhe i/by Adv. Sanadiip
                                    Mutaalik
                                        ...
                        CORAM                : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                       DATE                : 28.09.2026


PER COURT :

         Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that nothing
survives in this petition.

2.      The writ petition is disposed of as become infructuous.



                                       ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)




mkd/-




                                                                                1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.