Bombay High Court

VRUSHABH SAMBHAJI PAVASKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided: 23 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is allowed.

Summary

Vrushabh Sambhaji Pavaskar filed a criminal writ petition (No. 4082 of 2026) before the High Court of Bombay challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was heard by Justice Milind N. Jadhav, with Mr. Mohan L. Raut appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton for the respondent. The Court allowed the writ petition, indicating that the relief sought by the petitioner was granted. Due to limited time, the Court noted that a detailed reasoned order will be issued subsequently.

Subjects

writ petition
high court
criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                                          33.WP.4082.2026.doc

        Ajay

                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4082 OF 2026

                                  Vrushabh Sambhaji Pavaskar                         .. Petitioner
                                        Versus
                                  State of Maharashtra                               .. Respondent

                                                            ....................
                                   Mr. Mohan L. Raut, Advocate for Petitioner.
                                   Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                               ......…........…

                                                              CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                              DATE        : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026.

                                  P.C.:

                                  1.        Heard Mr. Raut, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Ms.

                                  Newton, learned APP for Respondent – State.


                                  2.        Writ Petition stands allowed. However, due to paucity of

                                  time, reasoned order will follow.



                                                                              [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

        Ajay
               Digitally signed
               by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.24
               15:01:08 +0530




                                                                                                      1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.