Bombay High Court
KETAN JITENDRABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The High Court held that it may order the prompt disposal of a pending bail application to protect the petitioner’s liberty.
Summary
The petitioner, Ketan Jitendrabhai Patel, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking speedy disposal of his bail application pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate Court. He had been in custody since 31 March 2026, and his bail application filed in June 2026 remained unresolved for over two months. The petitioner argued that the delay violated his right to liberty and sought a court directive for expeditious consideration. The respondent State, through its APP, did not contest the request for speedier handling. Justice Shivkumar Dige, after hearing both sides and reviewing the record, ordered that the petition be allowed and directed the magistrate to decide the bail application within two weeks, effectively disposing of the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether a High Court can direct a lower court to decide a pending bail application expeditiously under a writ petition
Subjects
- bail
- expeditious disposal
- writ petition
- criminal procedure
- high court order
Judgment
82-WP-4096-2026 (CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4096 OF 2026
Ketan Jitendrabhai Patel ...Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s
________________________________________________________________
Mr. Sarthak P. Shetty along with Mr. Dnyanesh S. Bhatkhande, Advocate
for Petitioner.
Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Vaibhav Katkar, Police Inspector, EOW, Mumbai, present.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is seeking expeditious disposal of the bail
application pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate Court.
3. It is contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the bail
application was filed in the month of June 2026. The petitioner is behind
SHUBHADA bars since 31st March 2026, yet there is no order on bail application and
SHANKAR
KADAM requested to expedite the bail application.
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM 4. Learned APP submits that appropriate orders be passed.
Date: 2026.08.27
18:44:41 +0530
5. I have heard both learned counsel, perused the documents
produced on record.
Page 1 of 2
82-WP-4096-2026 (CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
6. As the bail application of the petitioner is pending for more
than two months and the petitioner is behind bars since 31 st March 2026,
I pass following order :
ORDER
1. The petition is allowed.
2. The bail application of the applicant which is pending before
the Metropolitan Magistrate Court be decided as expeditiously
as possible and preferably within two weeks from the date of
receipt of this order.
The application stands disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…