Bombay High Court
RAHUL LEEKHAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Rahul Leekha, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented before a two‑judge bench comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Ashish S. Chavan. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Soham Damble, appearing through Ms. Paavani Chadha, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may permit the withdrawal of a writ petition after it has been filed
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- procedural law
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
RUSHIKESH
RUSHIKESH VISHNU
VISHNU PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.09.09
18:32:34
+0530
1/1 13 WP.4105.2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4105 OF 2026
Rahul Leekha .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
…
Mr. Soham Damble i/by Paavani Chadha, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent-State.
...
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.
DATED : 08th SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C:-
1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
(ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Rushikesh
Checking your session…