Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABDUL RAZAK ISMAIL SUPARIWALAversusREGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER AT MUMBAI AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the Court.

Summary

Vaishali Anil Tikam filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4124 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the Regional Passport Officer, Mumbai. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The respondent was represented by Smt. R.D. Humane. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal concluded the proceedings without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • passport

Judgment

                                                                           10-WP-4124-2023 (CR).doc

                   Tikam

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4124 OF 2023
VAISHALI
ANIL                   Abdul Razak Ismail Supariwala                 ...Petitioner/s
TIKAM                  VERSUS
                       Regional Passport Officer At Mumbai And
Digitally signed       Anr                                           ...Respondent/s
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
2026.10.06             _________________________________________________________________
12:25:58 +0530
                       None for Applicant.
                       Smt. R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                         CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                         DATE         :   1st OCTOBER 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.        None present for Applicant.

                       2.        Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.