Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NOORUDDIN ISMAIL QURESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition under Article 226 seeking the lodging of a criminal case is not maintainable.

Summary

The petitioner, Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 18 May 2026. The High Court examined the petition in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The Court considered whether a writ petition under Article 226 can be used to compel the filing of a criminal complaint. Relying on the Supreme Court precedent, the Court held that such a petition is not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the matter was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition under Article 226 for the lodging of a criminal case is maintainable in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra.

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • Writ Petition
  • Maintainability
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Supreme Court Precedent

Judgment

                    KSG                                                         14-WP-4136-2026.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.4136 OF 2026

                    Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi                                   … Petitioner
                             V/s.
                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors                             … Respondents
                                       _______________________________________

                    Mr. M.P. Mishra a/w Ms. A.B. Rawal for the Petitioner.
                    Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                    Mr. Ashish Dubey a/w Ms. Gayatri Gupta for the Respondent Nos.4 to 14.
                                    _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                        KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE  : 24th AUGUST, 2026

                    P.C. :

                    .               In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case

                    of Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported

                    in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, present Petition under Article 226 of the

                    Constitution of India for lodgment of crime, on the basis of complaint dated

                    18th May, 2026, filed by the Petitioner is not maintainable and is accordingly

                    disposed off.
       Digitally
       signed by
       KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:
       2026.08.27
       11:16:06
       +0530
                                    ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.