Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANIL SHRIPAL PATILversusGUNAJI SATU GAVAS AND ANR.

Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition was not tenable and therefore dismissed it.

Summary

Petitioner Anil Shripal Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, seeking relief against respondents Gunaji Satu Gavas and another. The petition was heard by Justice Shailesh P. Brahme on 4 September 2026. The Court examined the petition and concluded that it was not tenable. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition. No further directions were issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable/tenable

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • tenability
  • dismissal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                        42-WP-4174-2026 (C).doc




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 4174 OF 2026

Anil Shripal Patil                                                    ...Petitioner
      Versus
Gunaji Satu Gavas And Anr.                                        ...Respondents

                                  …..
Adv. Dattatray Solankar, Advocate for Petitioner.
Adv. Tanvi Lad a/w Adv. Ajay RajeNimbalkar, Advocate for Respondent
No.1.
                                  …..


                                      CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                      DATE      : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026.

P.C. :

          The writ petition is not tenable. Hence, it is dismissed.



                                                 [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]




    ZIP                                                                   1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.