Bombay High Court
PRADIP SUGRIV GHABAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION DEPT ORS.
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petition is dismissed as there is no judicial or quasi‑judicial order to be challenged.
Summary
The petitioner, Pradip Sugriv Ghabak, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a purported order of the State of Maharashtra. The Court observed that no judicial or quasi‑judicial order was identified as being under challenge. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was not maintainable. The petition was therefore dismissed. No substantive merits were examined as there was nothing to adjudicate.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable in the absence of a judicial or quasi‑judicial order
Subjects
- writ petition
- maintainability
- dismissal
- civil procedure
Judgment
46-WP-4178-2026 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4178 OF 2026
Pradip Sugriv Ghabak ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thr. The Secretary,
Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Dept Ors. ...Respondent
…..
Adv. Dattatray Solankar, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the Respondent-State.
…..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
No judicial or quasi - judicial order is under challenge in the
present petition. Hence, petition is dismissed.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]
ZIP 1 of 1
Checking your session…