Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHARAT TALAKSHI VORA AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and was disposed.

Summary

Petitioners Bharat Talakshi Vora and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later instructed their counsel to withdraw the petition and instead file a discharge application before the trial court. The respondent State of Maharashtra, through its APP, opposed the withdrawal. The learned judge considered whether the petition could be withdrawn at the petitioners' request. The court granted liberty to withdraw the writ petition and ordered its disposal. Consequently, the petition was withdrawn and the matter was left for the trial court proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed in criminal appellate jurisdiction can be withdrawn at the petitioners' request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • discharge application
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                            45.WP.4196.2026.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                  WRIT PETITION NO.4196 OF 2026

                    Bharat Talakshi Vora And Anr.                                      .. Petitioners
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                                  .. Respondents
                                                ....................
                     Mr. Kunal M. Patel, Advocate for Petitioners.
                     Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
                     WPSI – Shamali N. Joshi, Dadar Police Station.
                                                             ...................

                                                            CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                            DATE          : SEPTEMBER 10, 2026
                    P.C.:

                    1.              Heard Mr. Patel, learned Advocate for Petitioners and Mr.

                    Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State.


                    2.              Learned Advocate seeks on instructions seeks liberty to

                    withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file discharge Application

                    before the Trial Court in accordance with law.


                    3.              With the above liberty, Writ Petition is allowed to be

                    withdrawn and is disposed.



H. H. SAWANT                                                                 [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]


                               Digitally signed
                               by HARSHADA
                    HARSHADA   HANUMANT
                    HANUMANT   SAWANT
                    SAWANT     Date:
                               2026.09.11
                               11:13:53 +0530




                                                                                                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.