Bombay High Court
SUPRIYA AKSHAY DURGE AND ANRversusAKSHAY PRALAHD DURGE AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Supriya Akshay Durge and an associate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. They later approached the Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioners' counsel, Mr. Hassan Siddiqui appearing on behalf of Mr. Mateen Shaikh, made the request. The respondent, the State, was represented by Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP. The Court, after hearing the counsel, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, also dismissing all pending applications. No substantive merits of the original petition were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition can be withdrawn at the request of the petitioners
Subjects
- petition withdrawal
- criminal writ petition
- Bombay High Court
- procedural law
Judgment
46-WP-4229-2025 (CR).doc
N.S.Kamble
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4229 OF 2025
Supriya Akshay Durge And Anr ...Petitioners
VERSUS
Akshay Pralahd Durge And Anr ...Respondents
Digitally signed _________________________________________________________________
NILAM by NILAM
SANTOSH
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date: 2026.10.07
11:36:08 +0530
Mr.Hassan Siddiqui i/b Mr.Mateen Shaikh, for the Petitioners.
Mr.B.B. Kulkarni, APP, for Respondent No.2-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 06th OCTOBER 2026
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned APP for
Respondent No.2-State.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the Petition. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. All pending Applications are disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.