Bombay High Court
SANGITA SURGONDA @ SHANTINATH PATILversusCHANDRABAI BHUPAL MAGDUM AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that no interference was called for in the impugned order.
Summary
The petitioner, Sangita Surgonda @ Shantinath Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging an order passed by a lower authority. The petition sought interference with the impugned order. The Court, after reviewing the petition, concluded that there was no ground to interfere with the order. It directed that the pending matter, identified as RCS No.410 of 2015, be decided expeditiously. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition without granting any relief.
Issues considered
- Whether the impugned order should be interfered with?
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- order disposal
- high court
Judgment
50-WP-4249-2026 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4249 OF 2026
Sangita Surgonda @ Shantinath Patil ...Petitioner
Versus
Chandrabai Bhupal Magdum And Ors. ...Respondents
…..
Adv. B. R. Mangale, Advocate for Petitioner.
…..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
. No interference is called for in the impugned order. Suffice it to
mention that an endeavour shall be made to decide RCS No.410 of
2015 expeditiously.
2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]
ZIP 1 of 1
Checking your session…