Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Sagar LookoutsversusMumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and permitted the petitioner to institute fresh proceedings.

Summary

The petitioner, Sagar Lookouts, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay against the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and others. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court of fresh subsequent developments in the matter. The petitioner sought leave of the court to withdraw the writ petition and to be permitted to institute fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court considered the request and, noting the counsel’s submission, granted the leave sought. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to file new proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should grant leave to withdraw the writ petition and allow the petitioner to institute fresh proceedings

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • leave of court
  • civil procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                   22-wp-4318-26.doc

   INGALE

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
           Digitally
           signed by
           PALLAVI
PALLAVI    MAHENDRA
MAHENDRA   WARGAONKAR
WARGAONKAR Date:
           2026.09.17
           21:32:58
           +0530
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 4318            OF 2026

                        Sagar Lookouts                           ...Petitioner
                             Versus
                        Mumbai Metropolitan Region
                        Development Authority and anr.           ...Respondents
                                                           ...
                        Mr. Nikhil Dilip Waje, for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Mohit P. Jadhav, Addl. GP, for the Respondent No.3-State.
                                                           ...

                                     CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ.
                                          & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

                                          DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                        P.C.:
                        1.         At the outset, the learned counsel for the Petitioner

                        states that during pendency of the instant proceedings, there

                        have been fresh subsequent developments in the matter.

                        Accordingly, leave may be granted to withdraw the instant writ

                        petition   with    liberty   to   institute   fresh   proceedings       in

                        accordance with law.

                        2.         The instant Writ Petition stands Disposed Of as

                        Withdrawn with the aforesaid leave.



                        [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]                            [CHIEF JUSTICE]


                                                            1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.