Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAGAR LAXMAN MAAKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty for the petitioner to seek anticipatory bail subsequently.

Summary

The petitioner, Sagar Laxman Maake, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking anticipatory bail. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to apply for anticipatory bail separately. The Court examined whether such a withdrawal could be permitted without prejudice to the petitioner’s future relief. The judges held that the petition could be withdrawn, provided the petitioner is free to pursue an anticipatory bail application thereafter. Consequently, the petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application, which will be decided on its merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition seeking anticipatory bail can be withdrawn with liberty to pursue a separate anticipatory bail application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                                1 of 2                 11-WP-4341-2026
                              Sagar Magar

                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4341 OF 2026


                             Sagar Laxman Maake                                    … Petitioner
                                   Versus
                             State of Maharashtra And Ors.                         ... Respondent

                                                        __________
                             Mr. Murtaza Najmi a/w Mr. Jackya Jain, Mr. Dilip Shukla, Ms.
                             Priya Pandey, Ms. Farida najmi, Ms. Nancy Kanungo, Ms. Arefa
                             Siddiquie, Mr. Nasrah Ansari for Petitioner.
                             Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State.
                             Ms. Nisha Valani for Respondent No. 2.
                             Mr. Amrendra Sinha a/w Mr. Pankaj G. for Respondent No. 3.
                                                        __________

                                                 CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
                                                         RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.

                                                 DATE     : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
                             PC :

                             1)             Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that he will

                             exercise his remedy of applying for anticipatory bail in the subject

                             matter of this case. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition

                             with such liberty. Permission is granted. Petition is allowed to be

                             withdrawn with such liberty.


                             2)             It is made clear that withdrawal of this petition shall



          Digitally signed
          by SAGAR
SAGAR   SANTOSH
        MAGAR
SANTOSH Date:
MAGAR   2026.09.03
          14:26:42
          +0530
                                 2 of 2                   11-WP-4341-2026


not come in the way of the Petitioner to pursue the remedy of

anticipatory bail and if such an application is preferred, it shall be

decided on its merits in accordance with law.




(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.)           (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.