Bombay High Court

DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusSHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA JADHAVAR

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed in accordance with the parties' settlement.

Summary

The Divisional Controller of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a writ petition against Shivaji Ramchandra Jadhavar. Both parties, together with their counsel, submitted a joint compromise petition that was duly verified and marked as Exhibit‑X. The court recorded the compromise and confirmed that the parties had agreed to the settlement terms. The petitioners prayed for disposal of the writ petition in accordance with the compromise. The court, after hearing the parties, disposed of the writ petition pursuant to the terms of the settlement, directing the parties to comply with the agreed conditions.

Subjects

settlement
writ petition
civil procedure
compromise
court order

Judgment

                                                       83-WP-435-2026 (C).doc




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 435 OF 2026

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road
Transport Corporation                                                ...Petitioner
       Versus
Shivaji Ramchandra Jadhavar                                       ...Respondent

                                  …..
Adv. Yashodeep P. Deshmukh a/w Adv. Gurubala Birajdar and Adv.
Vaidehi Pradeep, Advocate for Petitioner.
Adv. Nisha Rajguru i/b Adv. Hemant S. Mali, Advocate for Respondent.
                                  …..

                                      CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                      DATE     : 24th AUGUST, 2026.

P.C. :

           Both parties, along with their counsel, have tendered on record

the joint compromise pursis duly verified by the parties. It is taken on

record and marked as ‘Exhibit – X’.

2.         The counsel and the parties are present before the Court and they

have confirmed the terms of settlement. They pray to dispose of the writ

petition in terms of Exhibit – X.

3.         The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis

at Exhibit – X. Parties shall act according to the settlement terms.



                                                [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]


     ZIP                                                                 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…