Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANGAL UMESHCHANDRA KARANDE AND ORS. 32versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY HEALTH DEPT. AND ORS.

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

Summary

The petitioners, Mangal Umeshchandra Karande and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its Health Department. They later sought leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file an appropriate application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The Court considered whether a petition could be withdrawn and whether liberty could be granted for filing a fresh application in the appropriate forum. Finding no impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal and granted the requested liberty. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn, with all rights and contentions expressly kept open for future proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • administrative tribunal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                                                         48-WP-4364-2026.doc


          Digitally signed

HARISH
          by HARISH
          VITHAL
                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VITHAL    CHAUDHARI
CHAUDHARI Date:
          2026.09.09
                                                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
          18:58:22 +0530
                                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 4364 OF 2026

                             Mangal Umeshchandra Karande And Others. 32                 ...Petitioners.
                                     Versus
                             The State Of Maharashtra
                             Thr. Secretary Health Dept. And Others                     ...Respondents.

                                                              ——————
                             Mr. Mahesh Vijay Rawool for the Petitioners.
                             Mr. R. P. Kadam, “B” Panel Advocate for the Respondent-State.
                                                              ——————

                                                                Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                            Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                                Date      : September 09, 2026.
                             P. C. :

                             1.        Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions,

                             seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to ile an appropriate

                             application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

                             2.        The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed

                             for.

                             3.        All rights and contentions are expressly kept open.



                              [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                         [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




                             Harish                              1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.