Bombay High Court
AMIT VIKAS PARALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn while granting liberty to seek the remedy under the Supreme Court precedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Amit Vikas Paralkar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue the remedy outlined by the Supreme Court in M. Subramaniam & Anr. Vs. S. Janaki & Anr. (2020) 16 SCC 728. The Court granted the requested leave and liberty. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to avail the remedy as indicated by the Supreme Court in M. Subramaniam & Anr. Vs. S. Janaki & Anr.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- liberty to file fresh remedy
- Bombay High Court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- Supreme Court precedent
Judgment
ssm 28-wp4405.2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4405 OF 2026
Amit Vikas Paralkar …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
____________________________________
Adv. Gayatri Nayak i/by Adv. Rajesh Khobragade for the Petitioner.
Shri. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
____________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C.:-
1) Learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave
to withdraw Petition with liberty to avail remedy as enunciated by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M. Subramaniam & Anr. Vs. S. Janaki
& Anr., reported in (2020) 16 SCC 728 .
1.1) Leave and liberty granted.
2) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed
by SANJIV
SANJIV SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR 1/1
MASHALKAR Date: 2026.09.17
10:43:29 +0530
Checking your session…