Bombay High Court
Lubrizol Advance Materials India Private LimitedversusThe Union of India
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the earlier judgment applies, quashing the refund rejection and directing a de novo consideration of the claim.
Summary
Lubrizol Advanced Materials India Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging a GST refund rejection of Rs.59,25,579 for February 2024, which the tax authority deemed ineligible because the services were not considered "export of services" under Section 2(6) of the Integrated GST Act, 2017. The petitioner relied on a recent judgment of the same court in Writ Petition No.987 of 2026, which held that similar services qualify as export and directed a fresh consideration. The respondents did not contest this reliance. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order and show‑cause notice, and directed the tax authority to reconsider the refund claim de novo within three weeks after hearing both parties. All contentions of the parties were kept open pending the fresh determination.
Issues considered
- Whether the services provided by Lubrizol Advanced Materials India qualify as "export of services" under Section 2(6) of the Integrated GST Act, 2017.
- Whether the tax authority's rejection of the GST refund claim on that ground is legally valid.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- GST refund
- export of services
- Integrated GST Act
- de novo consideration
- quash order
- show-cause notice
Judgment
17-WP-4411-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4411 OF 2026
Lubrizol Advanced Materials India Private Limited
Through its Authorized Representative
Anuraag Kothari .....Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India and Ors. .....Respondents
.....
Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Ms.
Bhagrati Sahu i/b UBR Legal Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. G. P. a/w Mr. Himanshu Takke, A.G.P., for the
Respondent-State.
..…
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.:-
1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner is seeking to quash and
set aside the impugned order in Form GST RFD 06 dated 17 th
November, 2025 and Show-cause Notice dated 13 th October, 2025
passed by the Respondent No.2.
2. The basic contention of the Petitioner is that the action of the
Respondent No.2 was unilateral, the Petitioner's legitimate refund
Manisha 1/3
Digitally signed
MANISHA by MANISHA
BALKRISHNA
BALKRISHNA TALEKAR
TALEKAR Date: 2026.09.22
19:14:04 +0530
17-WP-4411-2026.doc
claim of Rs.59,25,579/- for the period February 2024 was rejected on
an erroneous premise that the Petitioner is an intermediary and
services rendered by the Petitioner do not qualify as "export of
services" under Section 2(6) of the Integrated Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that his case
is squarely covered by the Judgment of this Court passed in Writ
Petition No.987 of 2026 dated 4th March, 2026 in the matter of
Lubrizol Advance Materials India Pvt. Ltd. V/s Union of India & Ors.
3. Learned Counsel for the Respondents does not dispute this
position.
4. In the matter of Lubrizol Advance Material India Pvt. Ltd.
(supra), this Court had remitted the matter back to the Appellate
Authority for de novo consideration and for a fresh order to be
passed in accordance with law. This Petition can be disposed of by
passing the same order. In these premises, the Respondent No.2 is
directed to reconsider the refund application of the Petitioner in
accordance with law. Hence, the following order:
Manisha 2/3
17-WP-4411-2026.doc
ORDER
(i) Writ Petition No.4411 of 2026 is allowed.
(ii) The impugned order in Form GST RFD 06 dated 17 th
November, 2025 and Show-cause Notice dated 13 th October,
2025 passed by the Respondent No.2 both are quashed and
set aside.
(iii) The Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of
the Petitioner de novo, in accordance with law and after
hearing the parties.
(iv) The Respondent No.2 shall complete the determination
within a period of three weeks from the communication of
this order.
5. Writ Petition No.4411 of 2026 is accordingly disposed of on the
aforesaid terms.
6. All contentions of all parties are kept open.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Manisha 3/3
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.