Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RASHID KHAN PATHANversusSHRI NIRAJ KUMAR GAYAGI AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.

Summary

The petitioner, Rashid Khan Pathan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nilesh Ojha, informed the Court that his client had instructed him not to pursue the petition. Counsel for Respondent No.1, Mr. Mandar Limaye, and the learned Government Pleader, Ms. Neha S. Bhide, expressed no objection to the petitioner's request. The Court therefore ordered the writ petition to be disposed of as not pressed. The Court noted that any legal issues, if they arise, may be addressed in a suitable proceeding in the future.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • non-pressing
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                          3 WP 4443-24-C.DOC




                                                                                  Priya Soparkar

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 4443 OF 2024
                      Rashid Khan Pathan                                       …Petitioner
                             Versus
                      Niraj Kumar Gayagi and ors.                           …Respondents


                      Mr. Nilesh Ojha with Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Anushka Sonawane,
                            Mr. Devkrishna Bhambri, Mr. Shivam Gupta, Mr. Ayush
                            Tiwari and Ms. Payal Padwale, for the Petitioners.
                      Mr. Mandar Limaye with Mr. Vedant Bende, for the Respondent
                            No.1.
                      Ms. Neha S. Bhide, GP with S. P. Kamble, AGP, for the State.


                                            CORAM:      SUMAN SHYAM &
                                                        ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
                                            DATED:      31st AUGUST 2026.
                      PC:-

                      1.     Mr. Nilesh Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner,

                      in this case, submits that on due evaluation of the legal issues, he

                      has instructions from his client not to press this Writ Petition.

                      Therefore, the Writ Petition may be disposed of accordingly.


                      2.     Mr. Mandar Limaye, learned counsel for the Respondent

                      No.1 is present and does not have any objection to the said prayer.




         Digitally
         signed by
         PRIYA
PRIYA    RAJESH
RAJESH   SOPARKAR
SOPARKAR Date:
         2026.08.31
         17:28:17
         +0530




                                                     Page 1 of 2
                                                   3 WP 4443-24-C.DOC




Ms. Neha S. Bhide, learned GP for the State is also present and has

no objection to the above prayer.


3.    In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands disposed of, as

not pressed. Legal issues, if any, are kept open to be decided in an

appropriate proceeding.



(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)                        (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
                                                                    {




                             Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.