Bombay High Court

KALYAN R. BAGADEversusUNION OF INDIA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS AND ORS.

Disposal: Dismissed

Holding

The court accepted the tendered proof of cost payment and ordered that no further orders were required.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition and submitted that the court costs had been paid. The petitioner’s counsel tendered the cost receipt, which the court recorded. The judges noted the payment and, finding no further matters to be addressed, ordered that no further orders were required. The petition was thereby disposed.

Judgment

                                                             3 wp-4446-2026(c).doc


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 4446 OF 2026

Kalyan R. Bagade.                                      ...Petitioner.
        Versus
Union of India and Others.                             ...Respondents.
                                  ——————
Mr. Rajvardhan S. Chougule i/b Dheeraj D. Patil for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar for the Respondent No. 1.
                                  ——————
                                    Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                    Date      : September 24, 2026.
P. C. :

1.         Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that cost

has been duly paid. Document is tendered and the same is taken on

record. Hence, no further orders are required.



 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                           [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




Patil-SR                             1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…