Bombay High Court
MADHURI RAHUL DANDEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The High Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Madhuri Rahul Dandekar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a matter that had been considered by the Supreme Court in Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The petitioner’s counsel sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. The bench, after noting the Supreme Court decision, granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court may grant leave to withdraw a writ petition after reference to a Supreme Court decision
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
- Supreme Court precedent
Judgment
KSG 20-WP-4467-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4467 OF 2026
Madhuri Rahul Dandekar … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors … Respondents
_______________________________________
Mr. Saurabh Ghag a/w Ms. Dakshata Sawant, Ms. Nikita Chavan, Mr.
Siddhant Raul, Mr. Sanghpriya Sarode, Ms. Monali Gandhave for the
Petitioner.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C. :
1) In view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in
2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks leave to
Digitally
signed by
KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY withdraw Petition.
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:
2026.09.17
15:29:31
+0530
1.1) Leave granted.
2) Disposed off as withdrawn.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.