Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MARATHI VIDYA VIKAS MANDAL, YAVALI, THR. ITS SECRETARY SAMADHAN S. KARANDEversusTHE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY, ZILLA PARISHAD, SOLAPUR AND ORS

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, without adjudicating the merits.

Summary

Marathi Vidya Vikas Mandal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Solapur. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court entertained the request, noting that it would not examine the merits of the case. It ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, expressly preserving all rights and contentions of the petitioner. The judgment further clarified that any adverse order, if passed, could be challenged by filing a fresh petition.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court
  • rights preserved

Judgment

                                                                                   40-WP-4509-2026.doc


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 4509 OF 2026

                        Marathi Vidya Vikas Mandal, Yavali ...Petitioner.
                                 Versus
                        The Education Oicer Secondary,
                        Zilla Parishad, Solapur and Others ...Respondents.
                                                      ——————
                        Mr. I. M. Khairdi, for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP, for the Respondents-State.
                                                         ——————
                                                           Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                       Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                           Date      : September 17, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        The learned counsel appearing for Petitioner seeks permission to

                        withdraw the petition.

                        2.        The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

                        3.        It is clariied that this Court has not gone into the merits of the

                        matter and as such, all rights and contentions are expressly kept open.

                        4.        In any event, any adverse order is passed against the Petitioner,

                        while adopting appropriate remedy liberty is granted to the Petitioner

                        to challenge the same by iling fresh petition.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                          [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.09.21
           11:53:29
           +0530




                        Gaikwad RD                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.