Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DILIP KUMAR @ YUSUF KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that leave to withdraw may be granted, rendering the writ petitions infructuous and disposing of them as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Dilip Kumar @ Yusuf Khan filed four writ petitions (Nos. 4527-4530 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later sought leave to withdraw these petitions. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the leave to withdraw, holding that the petitions had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court ordered that all four writ petitions be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original petitions were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may grant leave to withdraw pending writ petitions and deem them infructuous

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • infructuous
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                                          22.WP.4527.2019.doc

HARSHADA H. SAWANT
      (P.A.)
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                               WRIT PETITION NO.4527 OF 2019

              Dilip Kumar @ Yusuf Khan                               .. Petitioner
                         Versus
              The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                      .. Respondents

                                           WITH
                               WRIT PETITION NO.4528 OF 2019

              Dilip Kumar @ Yusuf Khan                               .. Petitioner
                         Versus
              The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                      .. Respondents

                                           WITH
                               WRIT PETITION NO.4529 OF 2019

              Dilip Kumar @ Yusuf Khan                               .. Petitioner
                         Versus
              The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                      .. Respondents

                                           WITH
                               WRIT PETITION NO.4530 OF 2019

              Dilip Kumar @ Yusuf Khan                         .. Petitioner
                         Versus
              The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                .. Respondents
                                          ....................
               Mr. Sujal Jain, Advocate i/by Mr. Manish Bohra for Petitioner.
               Mr. Amit K. Munde, Additional PP for Respondent No.1 – State.
                                           ...................

                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                          DATE          : SEPTEMBER 01, 2026
              P.C.:

              1.       Heard Mr. Jain, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr.

              Munde, learned Additional PP for Respondent No.1 - State.


              2.       Leave to withdraw the present Writ Petitions is granted as


                                                                                      1 of 2
                                                                           22.WP.4527.2019.doc


               Writ Petitions have become infructuous.


               3.               All 4 Writ Petition Nos.4527 of 2019; 4528 of 2019; 4529 of

               2019 and 4530 of 2019 are disposed as withdrawn.



H. H. SAWANT                                                 [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]


                           Digitally signed
               HARSHADA by HARSHADA
                        HANUMANT
               HANUMANT SAWANT
               SAWANT   Date: 2026.09.01
                           15:13:22 +0530




                                                                                       2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.