Bombay High Court
MEGHA KONDIBA PANDAGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petitioners are to approach the Grievance Committee formed under the 27.03.2024 Government Resolution for adjudication of their grievances.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench disposed of three writ petitions filed by Santosh Uttamrao Mundkar, Laxmi Vitthalrao Pandagale and Megha Kondiba Pandagale against the State of Maharashtra. The Court granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Grievance Committee constituted under the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 for redress of their grievances. It directed the Committee to decide the representations expeditiously, in accordance with law, the said resolution, and the precedents set in Baliram s/o Pandurang Salunke v. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.11172 of 2019) and Shaikh Tayyaba Jillani v. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.13407 of 2023). The Court emphasized adherence to the earlier judgments while handling the petitions. Consequently, the writ petitions were disposed of with the above direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners should be directed to approach the Grievance Committee under the 2024 Government Resolution for relief.
- Whether the Grievance Committee must decide the representations in accordance with the law and prior Supreme Court/High Court judgments.
Subjects
- writ petition
- grievance committee
- administrative law
- procedural remedy
- Maharashtra
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38746-DB
*1* 75-wp-4911-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
75 WRIT PETITION NO. 4911 OF 2023
Santosh Uttamrao Mundkar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
…
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4899 OF 2023
Laxmi Vitthalrao Pandagale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
…
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4532 OF 2023
Megha Kondiba Pandagale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Anand V. Patil-Indrale h/f. Mr. S. V. Gundre, Advocate for the
Petitioners in all matters
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for State in all petitions.
Mr. N. S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mr. A. N. Nagargoje, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 27th AUGUST 2026
P. C. (Per Abasaheb D. Shinde J.) :-
1. Writ Petitions are disposed of by granting liberty to the
petitioners to approach the Grievance Committee formed under
Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024.
Narwade
*2* 75-wp-4911-2023
2. The Committee shall expeditiously decide the
representations of the petitioners in accordance with law and
taking into consideration the relevant Government Resolution
and the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.11172 of
2019 in the case of Baliram s/o Pandurang Salunke Vs. The
State of Maharashtra and Others, as well as in Writ Petition No.
13407 of 2023 in the case of Shaikh Tayyaba Jillani and
Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others and connected
Writ Petition.
3. With this direction, writ petitions are disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Narwade
Checking your session…