Bombay High Court

MARATHA SAMAJ SEVA MANDAL, THR. PRESIDENTversusTHE DEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

Disposal: Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court declined to grant the relief and permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petitions.

Summary

Maratha Samaj Seva Mandal filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Deputy Charity Commissioner. The petitioner sought relief, but after hearing, the Court expressed disinclination to grant the relief. The petitioner’s counsel then requested permission to withdraw the petitions. The Court allowed the withdrawal, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue any other remedy permissible by law. Consequently, both writ petitions were disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought in the writ petitions against the Deputy Charity Commissioner

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
charity law
civil appellate jurisdiction
Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                  93,94-WP-4549-2026 (C).doc




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    93 WRIT PETITION NO. 4549 OF 2026

Maratha Samaj Seva Mandal, Thr. President                       ...Petitioner
     Versus
The Deputy Charity Commissioner And Ors.                    ...Respondents

                    94 WRIT PETITION NO. 4550 OF 2026

Maratha Samaj Seva Mandal, Thr. Its President                   ...Petitioner
     Versus
The Deputy Charity Commissioner And Ors.                    ...Respondents


                                   …..
Adv. I. M. Khairdi, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, learned AGP for the Respondents-State in both
the Petitions.
                                   …..


                                   CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                   DATE    : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026.

P.C. :


           Heard.


2.         After arguing for some time, when this Court expressed

disinclination to grant relief, learned counsel Mr. Khairdi requests this

Court to grant leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail the

remedy as is permissible in law.




     ZIP                                                            1 of 2
                                                     93,94-WP-4549-2026 (C).doc


3.         The writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to

avail the remedy as is permissible in law.


                                              [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]




     ZIP                                                               2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…