Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BIMAL RAMGOPAL AGARWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Appellate Authority must decide the pending statutory appeal within three weeks of the order’s upload on the High Court website.

Summary

The petition arose because the Desk Officer of the Home Department, Government of Maharashtra, informed the Appellate Authority of a pending statutory appeal, but the Authority failed to respond. The petitioner sought a direction for the Authority to decide the appeal promptly. The High Court examined whether the Appellate Authority was obligated to act on the pending appeal. The Court held that the Authority must decide the appeal within a reasonable time and issued a specific deadline. Consequently, the petition was disposed with an order directing the Authority to decide the appeal within three weeks of the order’s upload.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Appellate Authority is required to decide a pending statutory appeal within a reasonable time after being notified.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • appellate authority
  • statutory appeal
  • delay
  • direction
  • administrative law

Judgment

                    KSG                                                         4-WP-4585-2026.doc



                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                        WRIT PETITION NO.4585 OF 2026
                    Bimal Ramgopal Agarwal                             … Petitioner
                          V/s.
                    State of Maharashtra & Ors                         … Respondents
                                    _______________________________________
                    Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud i/b Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar for the Petitioner.
                    Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                    Mr. Yashwant Thorat, Assistant Section Officer, Home Department, State of
                    Maharashtra.
                    Mr. Mangesh Chavan, A.C.P., attached to Commissioner Office, Mumbai.
                    Mr. R.G. Gujar, P.S.I. attached to Malad Police Station, Mumbai.
                                      _______________________________________

                                              CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                      KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                              DATE  : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
                    P.C. :
                    1)           Record   indicates   that,   Desk   Officer,   Home      Department,

                    Government of Maharashtra, has already informed the Appellate Authority

                    about the fact of pendency of Appeal of the Appellant and hearing to be

                    effected on that. However, office of the Appellate Authority has not reverted

                    back to the concerned Officer.

                    2)           In view thereof, we direct the Appellate Authority to decide the

       Digitally
                    statutory Appeal of the Appellant within a period of three weeks from the
       signed by
       KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:
       2026.10.05
                    date of uploading of the present Order on the official website of High Court
       15:22:15
       +0530



                    of Bombay.

                    3)           Petition is disposed off in the aforesaid terms.



                                 ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                     ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
                                                                                                     1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.