Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVSHAKTI SHAKARI GULCOSE KARKHANA LTDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, as the petitioner elected to withdraw the proceedings.

Summary

Shivshakti Shakari Glucose Karkhana Ltd., the petitioner, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. After hearing, the Court expressed its disinclination to grant the relief sought. On instructions from its client present in court, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra should be entertained
  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • relief

Judgment

                                                                                   901-4590-2026-WP=.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 4590 OF 2026

                       Shivshakti Shakari Glucose Karkhana Ltd.                   … Petitioner
          Digitally
          signed by                     Vs.
UDAY      UDAY
          SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI   JAGTAP
                       State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                … Respondents
          Date:
JAGTAP    2026.09.21
          10:37:05
          +0530
                                                          ………….
                       Mr. Ranjit H. Patil for the Petitioner
                       Mr. Ruturaj P. Pawar for Respondent nos. 1 and 2.
                       Mr. Bhushan A. Walimbe a/w Varsha A. Kale, Moin Momin for
                       Respondent No.4.
                       Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent - State
                                                          ………….
                                                         CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                                         DATE        : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P. C. :

                       .         After hearing for some time, when this Court expressed its

                       disinclination to grant relief, learned counsel for the petitioner on

                       instructions from his client who is present before this Court, seeks leave

                       to withdraw the petition.

                       2.        The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.




                                                                      ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )




                       Uday S. Jagtap                       1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.