Bombay High Court
DATTATRAY DAGADU KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and was disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Dattatray Dagadu Kamble filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of an order dated 29/09/2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Revision Application No. 6/2024. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Anand S. Patil, requested a short recess to take instructions. Subsequently, the counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, a request unopposed by the respondents' counsel. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, Writ Petition No. 4597 of 2025 was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition seeking quash of an order may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- quash order
- procedural
Judgment
932-WP-4597-2025 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4597 OF 2025
Dattatray Dagadu Kamble … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
——————
Mr. Anand S. Patil for the Petitioner.
Mr. Nitin B. Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Amol A. Kanaki a/w. Mr. Prathamesh Patil for the Respondent No.2.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 2nd September 2026.
PER COURT :
1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the following
substantive relief.
“b. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for the Record &
Proceeding on the file of Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Solapur in
Cri. Revision Application No. 6/2024 & after perusing the
same, may quash & set aside the impugned Order dated
29/09/2025 passed by the Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Solapur
in Cri. Revision Application No. 6/2024 on such terms &
conditions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit & proper.”
osk 1 of 2
932-WP-4597-2025 (CR).docx
2. After hearing heard for some time, Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate
for the Petitioner sought for a pass over to take instructions from the
Petitioner. At his request, this Petition was taken up post lunch.
3. Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions
from the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition. This request
is not opposed by Mr. Amol Kanaki, learned Advocate for the Respondent
No.2 and Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State.
4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate
for the Petitioner, leave is granted to withdraw the present Petition.
5. Writ Petition No. 4597 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
OMKAR SHIVAHAR
SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.09.02
18:27:37 +0530
osk 2 of 2
Checking your session…