Bombay High Court
SADHAV SHIPPING LIMITEDversusJAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT AUTHORITY
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Summary
Sadhav Shipping Limited filed a writ petition challenging a blacklisting order issued by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority. The respondents indicated that they have been instructed to withdraw the blacklisting order, making the petition moot. The court examined whether the petition could be dismissed as infructuous in view of the respondents' withdrawal. An email dated 1 October 2026 confirming the withdrawal instruction was placed on record. Accordingly, the court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous due to the respondents' withdrawal of the blacklisting order
Subjects
- blacklisting
- writ petition
- infructuous
- port authority
- civil procedure
- withdrawal
Judgment
(909)-WP-4609-26.doc
PANCHAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Digitally
signed by
BALAJI
BALAJI GOVINDRAO
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL Date:
2026.10.03
WRIT PETITION NO. 4609 OF 2026
10:37:42
+0530
Sadhav Shipping Limited ...Petitioner
Versus
Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority & Anr. ...Respondents
...
Mr. Prathamesh Kamath a/w Mr. Nakul Jain, Mr. Kayush
Zaiwalla, Mrs. Apurva Mehta (Pohonerkar) & Mr. Anuj Hande
i/by ANB Legal, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Saket Mone a/w Mr. Raghav Taneja i/by Vidhi Partners,
for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
...
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Learned Counsel for the contesting Respondents
submits that the Respondents are already advised to withdraw
the blacklisting order and they are inclined to do the same.
2. In view of the categorical instructions as placed
before us, for all practical purposes, the writ itself is rendered
as infructuous.
3. Accordingly, Writ Petition is Disposed Of as
infructuous.
1
(909)-WP-4609-26.doc
4. The email dated 1st October, 2026 received by the
learned Counsel for the Respondents as written instructions,
is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]
2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.