Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SOU. PRIYANKA PRAVIN KAMBLEversusSTATE ELECTION COMMISSION THRU ITS ELECTION COMMISSIONER AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Priyanka Pravin Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging certain actions of the State Election Commission. The petition was argued by Mr. Siddhesh Kadam, assisted by Mr. Ashish P. Pawar. The respondents were represented by Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, Advocate General's Panel. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court agreed and disposed of the petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                      501-WP-4615-2023.doc


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 4615 OF 2023

                        Priyanka Pravin Kamble                ...Petitioner.
                                Versus
                        State Election Commission and Others. ...Respondents.
                                                    ——————
                        Mr. Siddhesh Kadam, i/b. Mr. Ashish P. Pawar, for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP, for the Respondents-State.

                                                          ——————
                                                            Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                        Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                            Date      : September 03, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the

                        petition has been rendered infructuous.

                        2.        The Petition is disposed of as infructuous.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                           [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.09.03
           19:27:04
           +0530




                        Gaikwad RD                           1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.