Bombay High Court
RAM SINGH SETIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is not maintainable and is dismissed.
Summary
Ram Singh Setia filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Special Judge handling PMLA Special Case No. 102267 of 2023. The High Court examined whether such a petition is maintainable in the criminal appellate jurisdiction. The Court held that a writ petition directing a criminal court in a pending PMLA case is not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was dismissed. The judgment was delivered by Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to a Special Judge in a PMLA case is maintainable
Legislation cited
Subjects
- Article 226
- writ petition
- maintainability
- PMLA
- High Court
Judgment
TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.10.05
10:21:25 +0530
TSB 4-wp-4639-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4639 OF 2026
Ram Singh Setia … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Murtaza Najmi a/w. Ms. Farida Najmi, Mr. Kunal Kanungo, Ms. Nancy
Kanungo and Ms. Rupa Shaw i/b. Mr. Atishay Jain for the Petitioner.
Mrs. P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 29th September, 2026
P.C.:-
1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
the Petitioner is seeking a direction to the judicial authority, i.e., learned
Special Judge seized of PMLA Special Case No. 102267 of 2023. According
to us, such a Petition is not maintainable.
2) Petition is accordingly dismissed.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.