Bombay High Court
KASH FOODS PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTORversusASSISTANT REGISTRAR C.S. SRA MUMBAI AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court restored the dismissed writ petitions and disposed of them in view of the parties' consent terms.
Summary
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for non‑removal of objections. The petitions were subsequently settled amicably between the parties, and consent terms were filed and marked for identification. The High Court, after noting the settlement, restored Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 50 of 2026 and Writ Petition No. 193 of 2026, which had been dismissed earlier. The court then took the consent terms on record and disposed of all the pending writ petitions on the basis of the settlement. Additionally, the court permitted the filing of a vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 2 within two weeks.
Issues considered
- The propriety of restoring writ petitions dismissed for procedural non‑removal of objections
- The effect of an amicable settlement and consent terms on the pending writ petitions
Subjects
- writ petition
- restoration
- amicable settlement
- consent terms
- civil procedure
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:36949
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4653 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4655 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4664 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4659 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4737 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4656 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26293 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 193 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26295 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2026
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd Through Director ...Petitioner
V/s.
Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai ...Respondents
and Ors
________________
Page No.1 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Rachana Mamnani and Ms. Ritika
Rajeer for Petitioner
Ms. Shyna Saheed i/b Vashi and Vashi for Respondent No. 2.
Authorized Person Mr. Tanmay Mehta is present.
________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.:
1) Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 50 of 2026 and Writ Petition No.
193 of 2026 are restored by recalling the office order dismissing the
Petitions for non-removal of office objections.
2) In all the Petitions, parties have entered into amicable
settlement. Consent terms are filed. Consent terms are taken on record
and marked ‘X’ for identification in each of the Petitions.
3) Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of in view of the
consent terms.
4) Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 in each
Petitions are permitted to be filed within a period of two weeks.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Checking your session…