Bombay High Court
KASH FOODS PRIVATE LTDversusASSISTANT REGISTRAR C.S. SRA MUMBAI AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court held that the dismissal was improper, restored the writ petitions, and disposed of them in view of the parties’ consent terms.
Summary
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for failure to remove objections. The court examined whether the dismissal was procedurally valid. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and filed consent terms, which the court marked for identification. The court recalled the dismissal order, restored the writ petitions, and then disposed of them on the basis of the settlement. It also allowed the respondent’s vakalatnama to be filed within two weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether the dismissal of the writ petitions for non‑removal of office objections was valid
- Whether the writ petitions could be restored and disposed of after the parties entered into a settlement
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- procedural law
- settlement
- consent order
- restoration of petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:36950
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4653 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4655 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4664 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4659 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4737 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4656 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26293 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 193 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26295 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2026
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd Through Director ...Petitioner
V/s.
Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai ...Respondents
and Ors
________________
Page No.1 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Rachana Mamnani and Ms. Ritika
Rajeer for Petitioner
Ms. Shyna Saheed i/b Vashi and Vashi for Respondent No. 2.
Authorized Person Mr. Tanmay Mehta is present.
________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.:
1) Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 50 of 2026 and Writ Petition No.
193 of 2026 are restored by recalling the office order dismissing the
Petitions for non-removal of office objections.
2) In all the Petitions, parties have entered into amicable
settlement. Consent terms are filed. Consent terms are taken on record
and marked ‘X’ for identification in each of the Petitions.
3) Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of in view of the
consent terms.
4) Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 in each
Petitions are permitted to be filed within a period of two weeks.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Checking your session…