Bombay High Court
KASH FOODS PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTORversusASSISTANT REGISTRAR C S SRA MUMBAI AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Dismissed writ petitions may be restored and disposed of upon the parties’ amicable settlement and filing of consent terms.
Summary
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for failure to remove objections. The High Court observed that the parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and filed consent terms. The court took the consent terms on record, marked them for identification, and restored the dismissed writ petitions. Accordingly, the court disposed of all the writ petitions in view of the settlement. The court also permitted the filing of a vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 2 within two weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition dismissed for non‑removal of office objections can be restored.
- Whether an amicable settlement and consent terms justify disposal of the writ petitions.
- Whether the respondent may be allowed to file a vakalatnama after the order.
Subjects
- writ petition
- stamp duty
- amicable settlement
- consent terms
- restoration of petition
- procedural law
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:36954
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4653 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4655 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4664 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4659 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4737 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4656 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26293 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 193 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26295 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2026
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd Through Director ...Petitioner
V/s.
Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai ...Respondents
and Ors
________________
Page No.1 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Rachana Mamnani and Ms. Ritika
Rajeer for Petitioner
Ms. Shyna Saheed i/b Vashi and Vashi for Respondent No. 2.
Authorized Person Mr. Tanmay Mehta is present.
________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.:
1) Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 50 of 2026 and Writ Petition No.
193 of 2026 are restored by recalling the office order dismissing the
Petitions for non-removal of office objections.
2) In all the Petitions, parties have entered into amicable
settlement. Consent terms are filed. Consent terms are taken on record
and marked ‘X’ for identification in each of the Petitions.
3) Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of in view of the
consent terms.
4) Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 in each
Petitions are permitted to be filed within a period of two weeks.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Checking your session…