Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Violet MonisversusThe State of Maharashtra

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is not maintainable and is therefore disposed of.

Summary

Petitioner Violet Monis filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the registration of a criminal FIR against the respondents. The petition was based on a complaint dated 19 August 2026. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The Court held that, following the Supreme Court precedent, the petition was not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any order directing FIR registration.

Issues considered

  • What is the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking registration of a criminal FIR?
  • Does the Supreme Court decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra govern the present petition?

Subjects

  • Writ petition
  • Article 226
  • FIR registration
  • Maintainability
  • Supreme Court precedent

Judgment

                               DTG                                                          22-Wp-4673-2026.doc



                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 4673 OF 2026

                               Violet Monis                                      … Petitioner
                                      V/s.
                               The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   … Respondents
                                              _______________________________________

                               Mr. Rakesh Pandey i/b ALJ & Partners for Petitioner.

                               Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.

                               Mr. Vidit Divya Kumat for Respondent No.4.

                               Mr. Vinod Lokare, PSI, Versova Police Station, Mumbai, present.
                                              _______________________________________

                                                         CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE  : 16th September 2026
                               P.C. :

                               1)           By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

                               the Petitioner is seeking registration of crime / FIR against the persons

                               mentioned in his complaint dated 19th August 2026, submitted to the

                               concerned Police Authorities.

                               2)           In view of decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of

                               Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported in

                               2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, Petition is not maintainable.

                               2.1)         Petition is accordingly disposed off.



                                            ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                      ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR
            TULSHIRAM
            GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.09.21
                                                                                                                  1/1
            18:22:29 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.