Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMESHKUMAR GHEWARCHAND TATED (JAIN) THROUGH POA-TEJRAJ GHERWARCHAND TATED (JAIN) AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.

Summary

Petitioners Vaishali and Anil Tikam filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition and to file appropriate proceedings elsewhere. The respondent State, represented by an Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioners' request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the Court permitted the petition to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, and dismissed the petition. The matter was thus disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition may be withdrawn at the instance of the petitioners with the Court's permission

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • High Court of Bombay
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                                              6-WP-4709-2022 (CR).doc

                   Tikam

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4709 OF 2022

VAISHALI               Rameshkumar Ghewarchand Tated (jain)
ANIL                   Through Poa-tejraj Gherwarchand Tated
TIKAM
                       (jain) And Anr                                  ...Petitioner/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
                       VERSUS
ANIL TIKAM             State Of Maharashtra And Anr                    ...Respondent/s
Date:
2026.09.29
10:33:56 +0530
                       _________________________________________________________________
                       Mr. D.S. Patil i/by B.B. Parekh, Advocate for the Petitioners.
                       Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP for the State-Respondent.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                            CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                            DATE        :   28th SEPTEMBER 2026.
                       P.C. :



                       1.         Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned APP.

                       2.         Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                       to withdraw this petition with liberty for file appropriate proceeding.

                       3.         Considering the submission of learned counsel for the

                       Petitioner, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

                       4.         Petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly.



                                                                      (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.