Bombay High Court
KASH FOODS PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTORversusASSISTANT REGISTRAR C.S. SRA MUMBAI AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court restored the dismissed writ petitions and disposed of them on the basis of the parties' consent settlement.
Summary
The petitioners, Kash Foods Pvt Ltd, filed multiple writ petitions challenging an office order that dismissed their petitions for failure to remove objections. The respondents, including the Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai, contended that the procedural requirements were not complied with. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and filed consent terms in each petition. The High Court, after noting the consent terms, restored the two writ petitions (Nos. 50 of 2026 and 193 of 2026) that had been dismissed. The Court then disposed of all the writ petitions on the basis of the settlement. It also directed that the vakalatnama for Respondent No.2 may be filed within two weeks. No substantive questions of law were adjudicated beyond the procedural restoration.
Issues considered
- Whether the dismissal of the writ petitions for non‑removal of office objections can be set aside
- Whether the court may entertain consent terms and dispose of the petitions on the basis of an amicable settlement
- Whether a vakalatnama may be filed after the petitions have been disposed
Subjects
- writ petition
- stamp duty
- consent terms
- amicable settlement
- restoration of petition
- procedural order
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:36953
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4653 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4655 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4664 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4659 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4737 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4656 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26293 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 193 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26295 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2026
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd Through Director ...Petitioner
V/s.
Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai ...Respondents
and Ors
________________
Page No.1 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx
Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Rachana Mamnani and Ms. Ritika
Rajeer for Petitioner
Ms. Shyna Saheed i/b Vashi and Vashi for Respondent No. 2.
Authorized Person Mr. Tanmay Mehta is present.
________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.:
1) Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 50 of 2026 and Writ Petition No.
193 of 2026 are restored by recalling the office order dismissing the
Petitions for non-removal of office objections.
2) In all the Petitions, parties have entered into amicable
settlement. Consent terms are filed. Consent terms are taken on record
and marked ‘X’ for identification in each of the Petitions.
3) Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of in view of the
consent terms.
4) Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 in each
Petitions are permitted to be filed within a period of two weeks.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
7 SEPTEMBER 2026
Checking your session…