Bombay High Court
DAWOODKHAN ABDULHA KHAN THROUGH GPA MOHD MAZHAR ATLAB ALTABFUL RAHEMANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Dawoodkhan Abdulha Khan filed a writ petition (No. 4762 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On 31 August 2026, the petitioner's counsel was absent, and no representative appeared on the scheduled date of 7 September 2026. The court noted the continued absence of counsel and the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41320
59 WP4762.2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
59 WRIT PETITION NO. 4762 OF 2015
DAWOODKHAN ABDULHA KHAN THROUGH GPA MOHD
MAZHAR ATLAB ALTABFUL RAHEMAN
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. P. Dawalkar
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 07.09.2026
PER COURT :-
1. On 31.08.2026, recording absence of learned counsel
for the Petitioner the petition was posted today. Today also, none
present for the Petitioner.
2. As such, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…