Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANDEEP BRIJLAAL SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of without any relief being granted.

Summary

The petitioner, Sandeep Brijlal Sharma, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. After hearing the petitioner's counsel, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. Consequently, the petitioner's counsel requested unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. The petition was thereafter disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the relief sought by the petitioner should be granted

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE

Digitally signed
by TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
                            TSB                                                  16-wp-4815-2026.doc
Date: 2026.10.05
11:17:02 +0530



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 4815 OF 2026

                   Sandeep Brijlal Sharma                                   … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                   The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                          … Respondents



                   Mr. Sandeep Dilip Shinde a/w.                  Mr.   Chetan    H.   Deshmukh        and
                   Mr. Jayvardhan H. for the Petitioner.

                   Mrs. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent -State.




                                                      CORAM :   A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE : 29th September, 2026

                   P.C.:-

                   1)                After hearing learned Advocate for the Petitioner at length,

                   when this Court was not inclined to grant relief as prayed for, learned

                   Advocate on instructions seeks leave to withdraw Petition unconditionally.

                   1.1)              Leave granted.

                   2)                Disposed off as withdrawn.



                                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                                       1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.