Bombay High Court
DIGAMBAR BHAUSAHEB LAVHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The petition was withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Mr. Digambar Bhausaheb Lavhale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. Subsequently, the petitioner's advocate requested unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The bench granted the request for leave to withdraw. The petition was then formally disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn unconditionally after the court has heard counsel and indicated no relief will be granted
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.10.05
10:21:26 +0530
TSB 20-wp-4820-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4820 OF 2026
Mr.Digambar Bhausaheb Lavhale … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Milind Jadhav for the Petitioner.
Mrs. P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 29th September, 2026
P.C.:-
1) After hearing learned Advocate for Petitioner at length, when
this Court was not inclined to grant any relief as prayed for, the learned
Advocate on instructions sought leave to withdraw Petition unconditionally.
1.1) Leave granted.
2) Disposed off as withdrawn.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.