Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANTARAM NAGORAO DHONE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the subject matter had become stale.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an unspecified action of the State of Maharashtra. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents argued that the passage of time had rendered the subject matter of the petition infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and disposed of the writ petition on the ground of lapse of time. No further orders were made, and any pending applications, if any, were also disposed of. The petition was therefore dismissed without addressing the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the lapse of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • passage of time
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37200
                                                  1                      63-WP-4838-09.odt




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 4838 OF 2009

                            SANTARAM NAGORAO DHONE AND OTHERS
                                            VERSUS
                            THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                               …
                          AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3 : Mr. V. M. Jaware
                         Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Vijay B. Jagtap
                      Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. Shahaji B Ghatol Patil
                                               ...

                                           CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                           DATE       :   17-08-2026
                PER COURT:-

                1.    The learned A.G.P. for respondents No.1 to 3, on instructions,

                submits that due to the passage of time, the subject matter of this

                petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is

                disposed of.

                2.    Rule stands discharged.

                3.    Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.




                                                  [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
                                                          JUDGE

                rrd


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.