Bombay High Court

MANISHA SANJAYKUMAR SATHE AND ANRversusSANJAYKUMAR BABASAHEB SATHE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: ABHAY S WAGHWASE

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Manisha Sanjaykumar Sathe and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Sanjaykumar Babasaheb Sathe. The petitioners were represented by Advocate P. P. Chavan. The respondent, through Advocate Prajakta P. Deshmukh (holding the brief of Milind M. Patil), submitted that the dispute had become infructuous. The court considered the respondent’s submission that there was no longer any live controversy. Accordingly, the bench held that the petition could be disposed of as infructuous. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

infructuous
writ petition
disposal

Judgment

                                                      30-WP-4843-2006.odt




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                30 WRIT PETITION NO. 4843 OF 2006

            MANISHA SANJAYKUMAR SATHE AND ANR
                              VERSUS
                SANJAYKUMAR BABASAHEB SATHE
                                 .…
Mr. P. P. Chavan, Advocate for Petitioners
Ms Prajakta P. Deshmukh h/f Mr. Milind M. Patil, Advocate for
Respodent
                                 .…

                      CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                        DATE : June 22, 2026
PER COURT :-


1.             Learned counsel for respondent makes a statement

that matter has become infructuous. Therefore, she urges to

dispose off the same.


2.             In view of above, writ petition stands disposed off as

infructuous.



                                      [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]

SMS




                                                                   1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…