Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASMIT MANGESH PARKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. DEPT. OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Since the portal was closed and all seats were already allocated, the court held that there was no remaining issue to consider and disposed of the petition.

Summary

Petitioner Asmit Mangesh Parkhe filed a writ petition challenging the closure of the admission portal and the allocation of seats in the CAP and Management Quota rounds. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and the CET Cell, contended that the portal had already been closed and all seats had been filled, leaving no matter for the court to consider. The petition sought relief to reopen the portal or allocate seats. The court examined whether any pending issue remained that warranted judicial intervention. Finding that the admission process was complete and no seats were available, the court concluded there was nothing left for consideration. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be entertained when the admission portal is closed and all seats in the CAP and Management Quota rounds have been filled

Subjects

  • CAP round
  • Management Quota
  • admission portal
  • writ petition
  • seat allocation

Judgment

                                                                                         56-WP-4846-2026.doc



                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 4846 OF 2026

                        Asmit Mangesh Parkhe                                   ...Petitioner
                                  Versus
                        The State of Maharashtra and Others                    ...Respondents

                                                         ——————
                        Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad with Mr. Samrat Hajare & Mr. Suraj Bhosale & Ms. Pratiksha
                        Chaugule, for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP, for the Respondents-State.
                        Mr. Nagesh Chavan with Ms. Ankita Chindage, for the Respondent No.2-CET Cell.
                                                         ——————
                                                           Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                       Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                           Date      : October 05, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        Mr. Chavan, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-State

                        CET Cell submits that the portal has been closed and the CAP round as

                        well as Management Quota round has already concluded and all seats

                        have been illed. In view thereof, nothing survives for consideration in

                        the present petition.

                        2.        The Petition stands disposed of.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                          [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]


           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.10.06
           10:49:14
           +0530




                        Gaikwad RD                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.