Bombay High Court

GAJANANA SURESH PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE PR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FOREST AND ORS

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt an appropriate remedy.

Summary

The petitioner, Gajanana Suresh Pawar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue an appropriate remedy later. The Court granted the request, ordering the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. The Court expressly noted that it did not examine the merits of the case. Consequently, all rights and contentions of the parties remain open for future proceedings.

Issues considered

Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue an alternative remedy

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
civil appellate jurisdiction
high court

Judgment

                                                          903 wp-4847-2026(c).doc


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 4847 OF 2026

Gajanana Suresh Pawar.                                      ...Petitioner.
        Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others.                        ...Respondents.
                            ——————
Mr. Yogesh P. Morbale for the Petitioner.
Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                 ——————
                                   Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                               Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                   Date      : September 29, 2026.
P. C. :

1.         Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions,

seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to adopt

appropriate remedy. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with

liberty as prayed.

2.         It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the

matter and as such all rights and contentions of all the parties are

expressly kept open.



 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                         [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




Patil-SR                            1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…