Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMESH TUKARAM INGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, and the third respondent is directed to decide the petitioner’s representation within eight weeks.

Summary

Ramesh Tukaram Ingle filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding a representation he submitted on 20 November 2025. The petitioner sought relief, but the court observed that the prayer raised was innocuous and did not warrant extensive adjudication. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition, directing the third respondent (a department of the State) to consider the petitioner’s representation on its merits. The court ordered that the decision on the representation be delivered within eight weeks of receipt of the order. No substantive legal questions or statutory provisions were examined beyond the procedural direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition seeking relief against the State’s inaction on the petitioner’s representation should be entertained on merits

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • high court
  • procedural disposal
  • innocuous prayer
  • Maharashtra

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37787-DB
                                                     1                      6.doc



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                          6 WRIT PETITION NO. 4856 OF 2026

                         RAMESH TUKARAM INGLE
                                 VERSUS
       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                              ...


                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane
                        AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.B. Bhise

                                              …
                                          CORAM          : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                           ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                              DATE       : 20.08.2026

             PER COURT :
             .        Since an innocuous prayer is pressed into the service by the
             petitioner, Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to
             decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20.11.2025, on its
             own merits, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of
             receipt of copy of this order.




             ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )                   ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )




   vsj..


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.