Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUKUNDA GOKUL BORSEversusSUNIL LAXMAN SHINDE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because of the lapse of time.

Summary

The petitioner, Mukunda Gokul Borse, filed Writ Petition No. 4868 of 2014 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. H. A. Karad (and Mr. Hon Ashwin), argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court examined the submission that the petition was stale. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable given the lapse of time rendering it infructuous

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • limitation period
  • court disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39693



                                                                100 WP4868.2014
                                             -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             100 WRIT PETITION NO. 4868 OF 2014

                                 MUKUNDA GOKUL BORSE
                                           VERSUS
                           SUNIL LAXMAN SHINDE AND OTHERS
                                              ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. H. A. Karad h/f. Mr. Hon Ashwin
              V.
                                              ...


                                         CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                            Date : 01.09.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Mr. H. A. Karad, learned counsel appearing for the

              Petitioner submits that by passage of time the Petition is

              rendered infructuous.


              2.           As such, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as

              infructuous.



                                                   (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.