Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

FARAZ AKHTAR UPLETAWALAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed and disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Faraz Akhtar Upletawala, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after hearing the counsel, accepted this submission. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and disposed of as infructuous. All pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                              28-WP-4869-2021 (CR).doc
                             S.S.Kilaje




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4869 OF 2021

                             Faraz Akhtar Upletawala                                        ...Petitioner/s
                             VERSUS
          Digitally signed
                             Union Of India And Anr.                                        ...Respondent/s
SONALI SATISH
       by SONALI
               KILAJE
SATISH Date:
       2026.10.09
KILAJE 15:19:58
       +0530
                             _________________________________________________________________

                             Ms. Chaitali Bhogale (Through VC) i/b Mr. Sagar Kasar, Advocate for Petitioner.
                             Mr. S.S.Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State.
                             _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM        : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE         : 8th OCTOBER, 2026.
                             P.C. :

                             1.       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

                             2.       Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition has become

                             infructuous.

                             3.       Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, petition

                             is dismissed and disposed of as become infructuous.

                             4.       All pending applications, if any, also disposed of.



                                                                               (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                      1 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.