Bombay High Court
SANTOSH UTTAMRAO MUNDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Petitioners must first approach the Grievance Committee constituted under the 27‑03‑2024 Government Resolution before the court entertains their claims.
Summary
The petitioners, Santosh Uttamrao Mundkar, Laxmi Vitthalrao Pandagale, and Megha Kondiba Pandagale, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petitioners were required to first approach the Grievance Committee established under the Government Resolution dated 27‑03‑2024. Relying on the earlier judgments in Baliram s/o Pandurang Salunke v. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No. 11172 of 2019) and Shaikh Tayyaba Jillani v. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No. 13407 of 2023), the Court held that the grievance mechanism must be exhausted. Accordingly, the Court granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Committee and directed it to decide their representations expeditiously. The Court ordered that the Committee’s decision be made in accordance with law, the relevant resolution, and the cited precedents. With this direction, the writ petitions were disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners must first approach the Grievance Committee constituted under the 27‑03‑2024 Government Resolution before seeking judicial relief
- Whether the Court can direct the petitioners to exhaust the administrative remedy prescribed by the Government Resolution
Subjects
- writ petition
- grievance committee
- administrative remedy
- government resolution
- judicial review
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38744-DB
*1* 75-wp-4911-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
75 WRIT PETITION NO. 4911 OF 2023
Santosh Uttamrao Mundkar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
…
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4899 OF 2023
Laxmi Vitthalrao Pandagale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
…
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4532 OF 2023
Megha Kondiba Pandagale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Anand V. Patil-Indrale h/f. Mr. S. V. Gundre, Advocate for the
Petitioners in all matters
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for State in all petitions.
Mr. N. S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mr. A. N. Nagargoje, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 27th AUGUST 2026
P. C. (Per Abasaheb D. Shinde J.) :-
1. Writ Petitions are disposed of by granting liberty to the
petitioners to approach the Grievance Committee formed under
Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024.
Narwade
*2* 75-wp-4911-2023
2. The Committee shall expeditiously decide the
representations of the petitioners in accordance with law and
taking into consideration the relevant Government Resolution
and the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.11172 of
2019 in the case of Baliram s/o Pandurang Salunke Vs. The
State of Maharashtra and Others, as well as in Writ Petition No.
13407 of 2023 in the case of Shaikh Tayyaba Jillani and
Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others and connected
Writ Petition.
3. With this direction, writ petitions are disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Narwade
Checking your session…