Bombay High Court
RADHESH POPAT BADALE PATILversusGADAGEMAHARAJ MARATHA DHARMSHALA TRUST AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to agitate the grievance in the regular civil suit No. 136/2009.
Summary
Petitioner Radhesh Popat Badale Patil filed a writ petition against GadageMaharaJ Maratha Dharmshala Trust and others seeking relief. The High Court, after hearing, expressed disinclination to grant any relief. On the court's direction, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition and pursue the grievance in an existing regular civil suit (No. 136/2009) where the issue had already been addressed. The Court allowed the withdrawal, granting liberty to the petitioner to continue the matter in the civil suit and to lead evidence as per the issues outlined in Exhibit 25. No merits of the writ petition were decided.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request.
- Whether the petitioner may be granted liberty to pursue the same grievance in a regular civil suit.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- regular civil suit
- procedural law
- jurisdiction
Judgment
44 WP 4951 OF 2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
44 WRIT PETITION NO. 4951 OF 2026
RADHESH POPAT BADALE PATIL
VERSUS
GADAGEMAHARAJ MARATHA DHARMSHALA TRUST AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Santaram Tarale (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Rutik
Kashid
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 07.10.2026
PER COURT :
After hearing for some time when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant relief, the learned counsel, on instructions of his
client seeks leave to withdraw the petition and agitate his grievance in
Regular Civil Suit No.136/2009 as already an issue is settled below Exh. 25.
2. The Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to agitate
the grievance and to lead evidence as per the issues cast below Exh. 25 in
Regular Civil Suit No. 136/2009. This Court has not expressed anything on
merits of the matter.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
Checking your session…