Bombay High Court
JALINDARSING JABARSING PAWARversusBHIKAN CHINDHA MARATHE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- AJIT B KADETHANKAR
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous due to the passage of time and is therefore disposed.
Summary
The petitioner, Jalindarsing Jabarsing Pawar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found that the petition could no longer be entertained due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after a substantial lapse of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- passage of time
- court disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9904
1
6-wp-4970-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4970 OF 2024
Jalindarsing Jabarsing Pawar
VERSUS
Bhikan Chindha Marathe And Others
...
Mr. V. P. Raje, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. A. A. A. Khan, AGP for Respondent-State
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 09TH MARCH, 2026
ORDER :-
. Mr. V. P. Raje, learned Counsel for the petitioner would
fairly submit that due to passage of time, the Writ Petition has
turned infructuous.
2. As such, Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…